What is the Best Screen Type for Smartphones?

_10_articleimages_2007_09__articleimages__assets_images_phones_manufacturers_utstarcom_PPC6800_PPC6800SP_185-1.jpg (Image 1114)

In the forums, a contempo discussion came up regarding screen sizes, orientation and resolution and which is preferable. Leaving resolution to the side for a moment (since I call back it's universally agreed that higher is better), let's await at what WM devices currently offer and why some orientations are better for certain things than others.

WM5 & vi Non-touch screen: 320x240 i.e. mural. These are devices similar the Motorola Q serial, HTC Dash/Excalibur and Samsung Blackjack I & II
WM5 & vi Touch screen: 320x240 (very few e.g. Zenum Opus), 240x240/320x320 Square (Treos & Samsung i780), 240x320 (HTC 6700, 6800, Touch, Tilt, etc.)

Overwhelmingly WM devices tend to exist 240x320 orientations, and 320x240 for smartphones. Exceptions grow such every bit the Treo line or the HTC Phonation.

And so when shopping a device, which is meliorate and for what? Manifestly some of this just comes downwards to personal preference and some people will only flat out like one orientation over another. Only besides this there are some practical things to consider when judging a device.

The Full Smackdown is subsequently the interruption!

Landscape (320x240)

Landscape-only devices (most of the WM smartphone lineup) look fantastic for viewing video & Boob tube particularly with Slingbox or Zbop's famous YouTube plugin. This is because they closely resemble TV and picture attribute ratios and therefore use the screen space more efficiently.

Just I would argue they are not equally preferable for other things including heavy reading of email or the spider web. As I mentioned in the forums, holding a device ii feet from your confront when reading is not the same as watching a motion picture or your TV since your view range is much narrower. Furthermore, the media you are viewing e.g. text versus images are utilize 2 different systems for processing, which is why books tend resemble 240x320 orientation—they are longer than wide. This is because for reading in that location is less (macro) eye movement to drop downwardly a line than information technology is to read a long line left-to-right (think of a type writer action). Apple tree, I think, even tacitly acknowledges this by not letting you lot blazon in landscape (concluding I checked) only instead reserves that for generally video and Cover Menses. For this reason, I would suggest if y'all plan on doing a lot of reading, a foursquare screen or 320x240 resolution devices would be much amend. If you desire video and TV on a thin WM device, than these devices are perfect (seriously, Slingbox looks amazing on a Moto Q).

Square

In that location is also the argument of screen size. While a 320x240 device like the Moto Q has a higher resolution and looks ameliorate for video, it actually has a smaller screen than the Treo 700 series: 2.iv inch versus ii.6 inch. This should be somewhat obvious when looking at the two side past side as you lot are "trimming" the bottom of the screen to brand it landscape. This is where a 320x320 device (rumored Treo 800w and confirmed Samsung i780) will take an advantage: larger screen size and higher resolution. Video on these devices should exist very shut in concrete size and resolution to current 320x240 devices (although not-touch screens tend to take more clear and vibrant colors because the lack of layering, though this can be attenuated with newer engineering science like in the iPhone).

Portrait / Landscape Switchers

Of course 240x320 devices get effectually this screen size limitation since they tin can switch orientations and conventionally have sliding keyboards. This is the traditional PPC grade of devices like the Sprint 6800 and HTC Tilt. These devices tin have ii.8 inch and larger screens since the keyboard is removed from the front of the device. In a way, these devices have the all-time of both worlds: for heavy text reading and normal phone operation, the default 240x320 is perfect; for video, switching to 320x240 (mural) offers a large, nicely orientated viewing position.

Still at that place is one negative side effect: yous read an e-mail in one orientation (240x320) and accept to reply in another (320x240). This physical switching (and sliding keyboard) is disorientating for some and abrasive for others. This switching for the same task is something the iPhone forcefully prevents, which looks to be a design conclusion non accident. This is why some prefer to just have ane orientation as it keeps everything the equivalent (imagine rotating your Tv for unlike programming!).

What's your Primary Utilize?

Of course this whole discussion begs the question of what you choose your WM device for (besides a phone!): Video or Text. What's your nigh important First Device use? If you lot do l/50 and don't mind the switching of orientations, 320x240 devices are clearly the best as they maximize orientations for specific tasks. If you don't heed the smaller screen but like watching video then traditional WM smartphones work very well (and they are neat for low-cal text reading). This leaves foursquare screens as the perfect centre ground: mid-range screen size, great for reading electronic mail, websites and viewing consistency, something that will simply meliorate once 320x320 devices brainstorm to scroll out in early 2008.

Conclusion

Whatsoever my preference after using all three types (Moto Q, Treo 700wx, HTC 6700)? I adopt the square screen of the Treo line. The resolution is not great but everyday things information technology works quite well. If I were a "power user", no doubt the 6700/6800/Tilt is your best bet - and light users will benefit from smartphones.

This huge Xbox 'Quick Resume' update will give gamers more control

Xbox Insiders Update

This huge Xbox 'Quick Resume' update will give gamers more than control

Microsoft is calculation a new feature to Xbox consoles, assuasive you to permanently store upwardly to 2 games in a Quick Resume state at all times. The feature is heading out kickoff to Xbox Insiders in the Blastoff testing ring before hit the general public.

ASUS ROG Strix X570-E is the best motherboard for Ryzen 9 5900X

Solid Foundations

ASUS ROG Strix X570-E is the best motherboard for Ryzen ix 5900X

The motherboard can prove a blessing or a hindrance when used with loftier-functioning processors like the AMD Ryzen 9 5900X, depending on which you lot get for. Nosotros've rounded up the best B550 and X570 motherboards that are compatible with the new Ryzen processor.